Fiber Laser Source Brands and Selections
Mar 03, 2025
China Domestic brands of laser sources for fiber laser marking machines.
Raycus, Maxphotonics, JPT each have their own technical characteristics and applications.
The following is a detailed comparison and selection suggestions for these three brands:
Comparison of core parameters：
|
Brand |
Technical Features |
Power Range |
Beam Quality |
Stability |
Price Positioning |
Advantage |
|
Raycus |
Domestic leader, with a full industrial chain layout and mature technology |
20W-2000W+ |
High (M²<1.2) |
High |
Medium and high-end |
General industry, mass production |
|
Maxphotonics |
Outstanding in the high-power field, high cost performance |
20W-6000W+ |
Medium (M²<1.5) |
High |
Mid-range |
Deep engraving, highly reflective materials, cost-sensitive scenarios |
|
JPT |
Strong intelligent and customized services and excellent pulse technology |
20W-1000W (mainly medium and low power) |
High (M²<1.3) |
High |
Medium and high-end |
Precision processing, 3C electronics, flexible production |
Selection suggestions:
1. Processing needs
High-stability mass production (such as auto parts): Raycus >Maxphotonics > JPT
Reason: Raycus' long-term continuous operation stability and after-sales guarantee are better.
Highly reflective materials/deep engraving (such as aluminum alloy, copper): Maxphotonics > JPT > Raycus
Reason: Chuangxin' s high-power and anti-high-reflection technology is more cost-effective.
Precision micro-machining (such as mobile phone LOGO, semiconductor): JPT > Raycus > Maxphotonics
Reason: JPT's MOPA pulse technology is more suitable for fine adjustment.
2. Choose based on budget
Limited budget, pursuing cost-effectiveness:
Maxphotonics (lower price for the same power) > Raycus (mid-range model) > JPT (high-end customization costs are higher).
Adequate budget and pay attention to long-term maintenance costs:
Raycus (low failure rate) > JPT (intelligent to reduce manual intervention) > Maxphotonics.
3. Choose according to industry scenarios
3C electronic/medical equipment:
JPT (precision, low heat impact) > Raycus (stable) > Maxphotonics.
Hardware tools/architectural engraving:
Maxphotonics (high-power deep carving) > Raycus (universal) > JPT.
Food packaging/drug labeling:
Raycus (medium and low power stability) > JPT > Maxphotonics.
Summarize:
Raycus: Suitable for medium and large enterprises that pursue stability and versatility.
Maxphotonics: Suitable for users with limited budget who need to process highly reflective materials or deep engraving.
JPT: Suitable for high-end markets with precision processing and flexible production needs.
